Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Finally, a guest blogger

Benis: For this topic I felt it only fair to bypass my lovable (or hate-able) BISdom co-host and reach out to our long-time friend and Celtic die-hard Matty J. So, without further ado, some not-so-brief thoughts on Game 7 of the NBA Finals.

Matty J: Well that sucked....a few things before I force myself to think about the draft...

  • We had it. And we couldn't close. Sucks but that is the truth. We did everything we could have asked on the defensive end – well except box out. I told myself midway through the 3rd that if we win it, it is because Kobe shot his team out of the game. And that still happened. And it wasn't enough.
  • Fucking Ron Artest. Well I am glad he brought something to the table this series, and he played well when it mattered most, in games 6 and 7. Hat tip to him. Fucker.
  • Missed Perk, but primarily just as a big body. Can't say we missed him anywhere else except for his rebounding.
  • Good game by 'Sheed. Read everywhere already that his body has officially broken down, he was being subbed in and out due to cramps and strains, and he is retiring. If so, thanks for showing up in the playoffs; we will forget about the reg. season due to helping us down when it mattered most.
  • Frustrating offensive game. We go up because we went to our two clear advantages: 'Sheed on the block because Gasol couldn't do shit against that and Rondo pushing the ball hard. Neither happened in half 2. At all. Rondo with a very quiet almost trip-dub with 12, 10 and 8.
  • Kobe carried that team for the first 6 games. Shat the bed in Game 7. You better be loving some Ron Ron and Pau right now. And he better be loving them also. Have to admit he was killing you guys for a long time.
  • Fuck fuck fuck.

Benis: It came to the point where I was yelling at the TV: "No Kobe...pass the fucking ball"...that means yes he was trying to do too much. With that said...15 rebounds. Add to that some lock-tight defense on everyone he guarded (I'm guessing if we go back to the tape rondo scored his 12 against fisher and on the fast break...actually thinking hazily back I'm pretty sure that is the case). Did he deserve the finals MVP? Hell yes for games 1-6. Did he give us the Jordan "I'm not losing this game" moment...no...well maybe. But not in the way we expected. Regardless 5 rings.

So a few other thoughts: I feel ya'll got screwed on multiple calls. And that SUCKS. I appreciate you not bitching about it, but I think it's the truth. Second. God bless Derek Fisher. He has moved into the Robert Horry arena. He's not Robert Horry yet, but if he hits another huge three in the playoffs next year (or three like last night), he might be there.

And finally...Ron Artest. We all know how I feel about what he did to my Pacers. And for that I don't know if I can ever forgive him. BUT he did all he could last night. He played probably the best game of his entire Lakers career last night (all 100 games). And afterwards, he gave the BEST post game interview(s) of all time:




Motherfucker thanked his psychiatrist. He proclaimed that in his head before he drilled that final three he heard Phil saying "No Ron. No. Don't shoot that three." He brought his entire entourage into the postgame interview room. He thanked "everyone in his hood, his rap label, and his wife and kids" in that order. Just amazing. BISdom summed it up best with this BBM: "Anything is possible (thanks to Ron Artest's psychiatrist)." Amen.

Matty J: Well I missed the Ron Artest thing, because I was throwing shit in my bedroom. With that said, totally agree; he was great last night. He has been a force on Pierce the entire series, which we both thought would be the case heading in, but in game 6 and 7 he was a force on both ends.

The officiating was horrendous all series; I didn't expect anything different heading into Game 7. Gasol with waayy too many over the backs that don't get called and some phantom calls going against the Celtics killed us. But when you go to the basket, you get calls, not when you shoot 18 footers with 12 sec. left on the shot clock. So, kudos to the Lakers there.

As for Kobe, I am sure it is a bit bittersweet in his head, as they won, but he didn't get to put a definitive stamp on the series. He had his moments, but I think, in the end, that this will be remembered as his first team series win, which is great for the Lakers, not so much Kobe. No doubt he is stewing on that fact and will be for quite some time.

As for D Fish, he was great for you guys all series, and the Rondo/Fish matchup wasn't nearly as one-sided as it should have been. Part of that was because Fish was chasing Ray Allen all series – and doing a great job, but the other side is Rondo never really got into a rhythm.

As for my boys...the window is officially closed. Sad. Really sad. I am not off the bandwagon, but a lot depends on what happens over the next two months. Rondo is here for five more. Ray is a FA, who is going to get paid somewhere, and if not, he has to be relegated to a little less playing time...Ray killed us for stretches last night – I was telling my wife, when we first got him I thought about what a great basketball mind he has, but man, other than shooting, he is an idiot at some parts of the game. If he isn't spotting up, he is HORRIBLE on the break. Absolutely horrible. As for Perk, he won't be healthy until December, but it always takes a full season to gain confidence. So that is a full year without our starting center. Rasheed is apparently going to retire. KG is wearing down – although he had a very strong series after a slow start. Pierce is still better than most, but he certainly is on the wrong side of his career. We need some youth infused, and we need to hit a HR with our #19 pick. If we do that, and swing a trade for another body up front, we may be able to make another run at it, but it would require some help. Again, BIG TIME hat tip to my boys, I did not think that they had it in them this year.

(Though Benis and BISdom did.)

Benis: First I thought JA Adande summed the game up perfectly:

"Somebody will come across the box score and think this was one of the more hideous championship games ever decided. The numbers won't convey the tension felt by everyone who watched, regardless of their rooting interest or even impartiality."

Honestly what a noble response (by you). And I know I said it before but you HAVE to watch Ron Artest's interviews. He lost it...in a great way...unless it comes out later that in celebration he threw a box full of kittens out of a car going 70 mph Fowl dog style. I have to admit you're probably much more gracious than I would be...but then again I'm guessing the fact that I'm coming to Boston in 10 hours probably has something to do with it. No worries: I left the Kobe jersey at home.

I'll be the first to admit Kobe didn't do what I had hoped...but that's why it's a team game. And maybe that was Phil's toughest lesson to teach him. Which scares me because Phil might step away...and I don't know who else can corral Kobe...oh and Artest...but you get the point. The positive about Kobe's craptastic game is that next year he'll want it just as bad. Not only is #6 on the line, but the quest to be "the man" again is still unfinished. As an open Kobe affectionist (JVG style), I would ask the question what the fuck else do you want from this man? I'll admit it. He's not Jordan. Could he get there? I don't know. But I know one thing (LeBron hater alert) he's the baddest mother fucker since MJ. So let's give the man his due and quit damning him for his (public) flaws.

Lastly (before I'm guessing we have to move on to the NBA draft or you'll hang yourself), I give the C's so much credit. It's baffling how hard they played. I hope sheed doesn't retire because he's fun to have out there...and to hate (even as a Carolina fan). I hope your window isn't closed (though seats in the garden may be cheaper). The NBA needs the Lakers/Celtics...how do I know this? Because I live deep in college basketball country (a.k.a. no one gives a flying fuck about the NBA) and work in an office with predominantly women...and I came into work today (mildly hung over) and was greeted by "I don't know if every NBA game is like that one but man was it good." Didn't really get any of that with Lakers/Magic...or even Cavs/C's...the NBA needs ya'll to be good. As do I...a Lakers fan. So, once again, I hope the window isn't closed.

Matty J: Agree and disagree:

I agree with the fact that it was wonderful to have basketball matter on a national scale again – that is normally reserved for March Madness, but to say that in random places that had nothing invested in the game – such as a small bank branch run by women – to have them interested is all Stern could ask for? The biggest sway in fandom from when the NBA mattered (the Jordan era) to the present has been the loss of the casual fan. Random soccer moms can say that they watched Jordan, and that can't be said about the LBJ/D-Wade era. But, you bring the two most historically significant franchises in the game's history – who just happen to have a heated (although one-sided) rivalry, in two of the top five TV markets in the league, and people jump on board. Now I am sure that the games were less than what was anticipated in terms of execution and the art of basketball, but damn, they were intense. Each game started with such nervous energy that during Game 2, my wife began to ask me why I wasn't pacing or sitting in a catcher's stance two feet from the TV. You give the fans drama, and we will get behind it.

Here is my disagree: no way Kobe learned anything. Zero. If anything, he may have learned to dislike Phil a little more. After the Lakers won Game 7 in spite of Kobe, and with the surprising assistance of Ron Artest, he said all the right things that you say in post game interviews, and everyone was loving the team-orientated Kobe....and then he dropped the line about Shaq. Literally less than 60 minutes after his team carried him to an NBA title, he went back to himself and his place in history. If Wilbon would have said it or even if crazy eyes would have said it, fine, but it was Kobe Bryant talking about himself and his standing amongst the NBA elite. And that is what makes Kobe, well, Kobe. If he isn't that player, the Lakers and himself lose a lot of that swagger. For all of his atrocious shots he took (my favorite was the fade-away three from the corner, while being doubled, with 8 sec. left on the shot clock while a wide open Vujacic was feet away from him on the arc – to be fair, I wouldn't have passed it to Sasha either), if he doesn't shoot those, he's not Kobe Bryant. The same Kobe who killed his team at times was the same Kobe who went on the 19 point barrage in quarter 3 of Game 5, the same Kobe who wants the ball in his hands for every big shot, the same Kobe who probably had more to do with Ray Allen's dead legs and off shooting than anything else. Throw in the fact that all of those offensive rebounds: (a.) had to come off miss shots (b.) become a lot easier to get when you have two Celtics 25 feet away from the basket contesting a jumper.

And to be clear, this is not praise; this is fact. The Lakers are a better team, with that self-absorbed/obsessed egomaniac shooting bad shots and being himself. And this is why the Lakers will challenge for a 3-peat, and it will be difficult to deny them. That is, unless, Ron Ron gets tired of that cold stare and goes Last Boy Scout on him, which we all know is at about even money.

As for my boys, well, pride is beaming right now. The most common theme on messageboards and in the Globe/Herald has been the amount of pride the city and its fans have shown in the team's attitude and work ethic. It wasn't pretty – and at times it was ugly: when the Grizz killed us midseason I sat close to the court and wondered when we turned into the Generals – but the team that finished this season took all its lumps and still showed up every game. They had to play the four best players/teams in the league in D-Wade, LBJ, Dwight, and Kobe, and they almost went through them all. Throw in the fact that we may be witnessing the last gasp of four of the best players of our generation of NBAers in KG, Ray, 'Sheed, and Pierce, and it was a little somber. At the same time, you were proud of how they dug in each day and said "you may beat us, but it is sure as hell ain't going to be easy." Add the emergence of Rondo and the annoying but entertaining Nate and Baby, and this team became the opposite of the 2008 team. Instead of being over-talking, overpaid assholes who were winning for the first time (and weren't handling themselves that well while doing it), they turned into the underdog that, by the end of it all, you respected more than anything else. And if that is their goodbye to NBA glory and they float back to the middle, or age continues to internally decompose KGs knees, Ray's legs, and 'Sheed's gut, then I think, they may be fine with that.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Your 2010 All-Stars

BISdom: I feel like since we're more than a full day into June, we should write a new blog and it should be about baseball.

Since All-Star voting began this week, I'm wondering who our All-Star selections would be. What I'm thinking is that we both pick the players who we think should be All-Stars or, really, who we would vote for. Let's do a starting 10 for each league and then a few bench players. I'll let you start since it was my idea, and let's start with the Senior Circuit, since we're both likely to have some repeats there.

Benis: Probably a good idea. I'd hate to lose our one reader. First though, I tried not to pick COMPLETELY on who I'd want to make the All-Star team. Obviously, we're both Cardinals guys, so the bias probably runs a little stronger there – a.k.a. why not just put everyone on the Cardinals but Jose Lopez on the All-Star team? The answer is because they don't deserve it. So as much as it pains me to leave off my boy Colby Rasmus, his numbers at this point, (.279 batting average, 8 home runs, 23 RBIs and 34 runs scored) force me to keep him off my roster. If you're reading this Colby, please don't hate me...

Moving on…I also occasionally went with guys who were proven, not those just having a fluke first half of a season (sorry Ty Wiggington's of the world). Still, with all of that said, I had a hard time filling out my roster completely…though here is what I came up with for the National League, aka Senior Circuit:

  • Catcher: Yadier Molina. Yes, a homer pick, but he is a proven guy who's defense makes up for his offense (.258, 2, 28, 9). On paper, a guy like Rod Barajas from the NY Mets would make more sense (.268, 11, 30, 22). But there's no catcher in the NL who makes the ladies swoon (a.k.a. the Joe Mauer effect), so Yadi's my guy. Homer Pick # 1 alert.
  • Pitcher: Ubaldo Jiminez. Possibly the biggest no brainer on either roster. (At this point I'm not sure I've spelled one name right, so my apologies to the Jiminezes.) First in Wins (10), first in ERA (0.78). Not even my man crush on Adam Wainwright (ha spelled that right) or a perfect game by Doc Holladay could keep Jiminez from the SP nod.
  • First base: Albert Pujols. I'd claim homer pick #2, but tell me he doesn't deserve it. Give me a real case that Pujols doesn't deserve this spot. Can't be done. I don't even need his numbers. Moving On.
  • Second base: Dan Uggla. This was my first truly debatable spot on the team. Uggla gets the nod because chicks dig the long ball and his numbers (.268, 11, 32, 36) are slightly better than Martin Prado (.321, 4, 27, 27) and Chase Utley (.276, 10, 24, 36). At least in my mind.
  • Third base: Scott Rolen. Surprisingly easy pick for me. First I love Scott Rolen and miss him in St. Louis (though honestly a bit less with David Freese doing his best Rolen impression thus far this season: .320, 4, 32, 23). Secondly he's got arguably the best numbers for NL third basemen (.290, 13, 36, 31). Lastly he's playing on a REALLY good Reds team that honestly is scaring the crap out of me right now in the Central Division. So congrats Rolen; you're having a heck of a comeback year and you made my All-Star team.
  • Shortstop: Troy Tulowitski. The next truly debatable spot on my team. Tulo's numbers (.307, 6, 26, 39) look eerily similar to Hanley Ramirez's (.296, 8, 27, 30), but Hanley dogged it on the field, then was an ass hole about it. So Tulo gets the nod. Plus I just saw him on SportsCenter's Top 10 this morning…shades of a young Cal Ripken Jr. Nice.
  • Outfield: Jason Heyward, Andre Ethier, Matt Kemp. Okay so maybe Heyward shouldn't start, but the kid is fun to watch. Anyone who reminds me of Ken Griffey, Jr. is okay with me. Plus his numbers (.287, 10, 38, 29) are pretty good and compare favorably to the other OF possibilities. Ethier (.376, 11, 38, 25) and Kemp (.283, 11, 31, 43) have been downright nasty so far. Two last things to consider: the NL outfield pool this year was actually kinda weak in my mind. Secondly I fucking hate Ryan Braun so there's no way he's making my team. Especially when he doesn't deserve to. Fuck that guy.
  • Designated hitter: Joey Votto. Okay so there was an actual argument to be made against Pujols. That argument is Joey Votto. So far he was the only one I even thought about putting over Albert…and I didn't think long. Votto (.326, 11, 34, 32), Pujols (.318, 12, 39, 32)…only Pujols has been doing this for 10 years. Time to switch positions Joey or you'll be relinquished to All-Star bench spots the rest of your career.

BISdom: I was also planning on making some of my picks based on who I think will win the popularity contest that is All-Star voting, which I suppose is a bit different than picking based on merit or man-crushes. So, some of my picks will go that way.

  • Catcher: Yadier Molina. You spelled your first name right. Congrats. So I suppose I can't edit your writing if you're going to point out your spelling errors, typos, etc. So, you're bad.
    I think Yadi is hands down the best catcher in the National League. You listed the tangible numbers, which aren't that impressive, but the intangibles – at least based on modern stat-tracking – are all off the imaginary charts.
    The catcher spot is actually one of the hardest to determine because most catchers are just there; for the most part, they aren't stars or household names. I'd guess most people who are voting for All-Stars can probably name less than a half dozen catchers from all of MLB. But Yadi does have some name recognition because people always talk about him, he has two Gold Gloves, and is one of the three Molina brothers from that ESPN3 commercial that points out that all three brothers have a World Series ring. So, yes, this is a homer pick and was even more so last season with the game in St. Louis, but it's also a smart pick.
  • Pitcher: Ubaldo Jimenez. Considering the pitcher spot isn't voted on by fans, Ubaldo is a pretty safe bet (unless he pitches on the Sunday beforehand, a new wrinkle that could severely water down the pitching quality). You listed most of his important numbers. He also has a 0.90 WHIP, which means he's allowing fewer runners than he's pitching innings, and 70 Ks to only 26 BBs.
  • First base: Sir Albert. Even though Pujols isn't really having a Pujolsian year (he only broached double-digit HRs and .300 BA on May 30th with a 3-HR-for-3-ABs game that brought his HR total to 12 (against the Cubs, by the way)), he's still the best 1B in the NL, numbers-wise. There is a chance that Ryan Howard wins the voting, even though he's not super hot this year (.280, 9 HRs, 35 RBI), but I'm picking Pujols based on my own voting tendencies.
  • Second base: Chase Utley. This is Utley's spot to lose. His numbers are down a bit (only hitting .276 and on pace for about 75 RBI), but he does have 10 HRs already – only a couple behind NL leaders Uggla and Kelly Johnson. The Phillies picked a bad time to slump in terms of All-Star voting, but they have a lot of idiot fans who would vote for them anyway. I do think Martin Prado deserves a spot and may very well earn one.
  • Third base: Ryan Zimmerman. This is actually a very tough pick this year. There are arguably four players who might get this spot: Zimmerman (.306, 11 HRs, 31 RBI), David Wright (.269, 9 HRs, 36 RBI), Scott Rolen (.290, 13 HRs, 36 RBI), and Casey McGehee (.299, 9 HRs, 41 RBI). I'm guessing Wright wins, though his numbers are probably the worst, especially considering he's struck out more than twice as often as the next guy. Rolen has pretty good numbers, but a lot of his production has come in the past couple weeks, so I'm guessing he slows down. McGehee will get a lot of votes from Milwaukee, a city that always votes in droves, but I think Zimmerman wins on the Strasburg effect: the Natinals have a lot of nati(o)nal buzz right now and are playing up to the part.
  • Shortstop: Hanley Ramirez. Tulowitzki and Ramirez do have very similar numbers at this point. You bring up an interesting point about Ramirez's PR problems of late, but he did eventually man up. And there's a saying in the PR fields, though: there's no such thing as bad publicity. For better or worse, people know Hanley's name. Tulowitzki plays in Denver. The most TV time he's gotten lately is when he ran in behind Ublado to check on the runner on second that one time this year that Ubaldo had a runner on second.
  • Outfield: Andre Ethier, Ryan Braun, Jason Heyward. Ethier is pretty much a no-brainer, even though he took a couple of weeks off. He's got 50 hits in only 133 ABs for a .376 average, which is 50 points above the eligible leader, Joey Votto.
    Braun will be there. Sorry. You should really start hating Rolen and Votto more – two of your picks – since the Reds are the competition this year.
    But really, how much fun will it be to have a legitimate rookie start in the All-Star game for the first time since Sandy Alomar, Jr. started behind the plate 20 years ago. (Hideki Matsui (2003), Ichiro (2001), and Hideo Nomo (1995) all started in their MLB rookie seasons but played professionally in Japan before that.) Plus, Heyward deserves it.
  • DH: Ryan Howard. This is another position selected by the managers, and for the NL, it has to be a first-baseman, since they're likely to have four or more on the roster (Pujols, Howard, Votto, Adrian Gonzalez, Prince Fielder?). Howard is my pick because he'll probably have the most votes for a non-starter and because his manager is making this selection.

Who you got in the AL?

Benis: You picked that bastard Ryan Braun? What in the hell man? That guy's a bigger douche than LeBron, and you know how I feel about LeBron.

But I digress…First off, feel free to edit some of my blabber, but for the most part I'm grammatically incorrect on purpose. Wow that makes me sound ig'nant.

I found the American League picks even more difficult to decipher than the NL. It's not because I don't watch AL baseball (ESPN, TBS, and FOX make sure of that), but because there are multiple deserving guys at a number of positions. As before I'll start off with…

  • Catcher: Joe Mauer. As you may have been able to tell earlier I'm all about making sure baseball is fun for the women out there, so Joe you get my vote, which I'm not sure he'll need because my friend Holly will probably vote for him a thousand times, but I digress. He's probably not the most deserving at this point in the year, but screw it, it's my ballot.
  • Pitcher: Andy Pettitte. Not quite as dominant as our boy Ubaldo (or even Halladay), but the long-time Yankee great is having another good year. Currently he's first in wins (7) and second in ERA (barely) at 2.48. Plus he's been around a long time, and HGH or no HGH, he deserves the start.
  • First base: Justin Morneau. BY FAR the toughest spot to pick on either team. My top two picks for this spot are Morneau (1a) and Miguel Cabrera (1b). Both deserve to start, and probably would if Vlad Guerrero didn't find new life in Texas (spoiler alert he's my DH). Check out their numbers; .374, 12, 37, 36 for Morneau and .347, 14, 48, 34 for Cabrera. I guess I picked Morneau for his defense and the fact that hitting .374 is just bad ass.
  • Second base: Robinson Cano. Possibly the easiest pick to make. .366, 11, 40, 37…as Grandpa LeBron would say, "'Dem Numbers." Considering Cano plays 2nd, 'dem really impressive numbers.
  • Third base: Evan Longoria. Back to another tough-as-nails spot to pick. Alex Rodriguez is having a pretty damn good year (.293, 7, 41, 30) and will probably get better, but Longoria is having a better one (.318, 10, 42, 36)…so far at least. Plus, in my mind, I'm really voting for Eva Longoria.
  • Shortstop: Derek Jeter. So both the NL guys deserve it more than anyone in the AL I think, but since I had to pick someone, I went with tradition. Not that Jeter is having a bad year (.307, 5, 31, 33), but it's not great either…Honorable mention to Alex Gonzalez (.264, 11, 32, 31), but I couldn't vote him in. It'd just be embarrassing.
  • Outfield: Vernon Wells, Carl Crawford, Ken Griffey Jr. Yeah I know, Griffey is having a terrible year, but it's most likely his last. And, in my mind, we should honor one of the greatest players of my generation by giving him an All-Star game farewell. Injuries took years of Junior's highlights from us, and he never complained (well rarely complained). The Kid just loves to play baseball. And isn't that what the game is all about? So Griffey's on my team. Wells (.307, 13, 37, 34) and Crawford (.314, 4, 25, 40) get the last two OF spots over Alex Rios (.315, 11, 27, 32) and Jose Bautista (.247, 16, 41, 37) though both deserve to make the squad, as well, as bench guys.
  • Designated hitter: Vladimir Guerrero. Vlad has revitalized his career in Texas and is one of the few guys left in the league who bats without any batting gloves. I have to have a guy like that on my squad as well. I just hope he's not using the Moises Aluo hand crème.

Wow, so apparently I voted with my heart much more with my AL team than with my NL team. Interesting. And yes I know Griffey isn't eligible for an OF spot but I don't give a crap. It's my roster. And in my mind the Kid will always roam the outfield smiling and crashing into walls…though not always at the same time.

BISdom:

  • Catcher: Joe Mauer. It has to be Mauer because, well, we went to Cabo together. Jorge Posada is a good dark horse candidate, though, for three reasons: (1) he's not having a terrible year, considering he's only played about half of it, (2) any Yankee can win at any position in any year, and (3) he's close to the end of his career, but nobody really knows how close, so we could have a Shaq situation on our hands where a non-deserving guy starts 3 or 4 straight All-Star games just in case.
  • Pitcher: Jered Weaver. This is, again, tough because of the new rule. I wouldn't be surprised to see a lot more hometown guys starting games because they'll feel more, excuse the expression, at home and will be exciting for the fans as well. Weaver has a good 3.03 ERA and is 4-2 with 74 Ks in 68.2 innings, so his résumé looks fine. If he can win 3 of his next 5 or 4 of his next 6 decisions, I'd almost lock him in here. I just think so many managers will break their backs to ensure their aces start on that Sunday, so the options will be limited. I suppose we can feel (un)comfortable in the fact that the Cardinals have two aces in Carpenter and Wainwright.
  • First base: Miguel Cabrera. Morneau's .374 average is impressive, but Cabrera is no slouch at .347. He also has 9 fewer Ks and 11 more RBI on a worse team. Either pick is a winner, but I like Cabrera's chances.
  • Second base: Robinson Cano. D-Pads isn't that far behind Cano, but Cano obviously deserves the start.
    Fantasy.
  • Third base: Alex Rodriguez. You're right: this is another particularly close call, especially considering the positive PR Longoria has gotten lately from his stupid hat commercial and his "best player under 25 but is still getting less than $1 million this year" moniker and the negative PR that seems to follow A-Rod (maybe because of his bad decisions and closed-off personality). I think/hope (for fantasy purposes) that A-Rod will have better numbers than Longoria by the end of the voting, which will add enough peripheral votes to the already enormous voting base that follows all Yankees.
  • Shortstop: Derek Jeter. There is almost no way that Jeter doesn't get voted in. He's also not having a bad year and has hit .429 (9/21) over his ten All-Star performances, including an MVP performance in 2000. Maybe someone like Jason Bartlett will unseat Jeter in the future, but for now, he's an All-Star necessity. He should just compete in a HR derby for fun. He'd have to do better than Brandon Inge did last year.
  • Outfield: Ichiro Suzuki, Carl Crawford, Vernon Wells. Ichiro has started every All-Star game since he's joined MLB; there's no reason to think that'll stop now. The guy is just hugely popular. He's also having another very Ichiro year with a .346 BA and a .395 OBP. He's second in the AL in hits (73) behind only Cano (75). He only has 25 runs and 11 RBI, but the whole team has only scored 190 runs this season, so he's involved in about 20% of them.
    Considering their blazing hot start, the Rays need an All-Star starter. This is probably the only spot where they'll beat out the Yankees, however. David Price could also start at pitcher, though he's not looked great in his past two starts. By the way, when you show Carl Crawford's stat line, you need to include his SBs (17 in 21 attempts).
    You already showed Vernon Wells numbers, which are the best in the AL for outfielders this year.
  • DH: Ken Griffey, Jr. I also wanted to put Griffey in the outfield, but he isn't eligible. Fortunately, unlike in the NL, the fans do get to vote for the AL DH, where Griffey is eligible. I hope they make the right decision. The only way he can start in the outfield is if he's written in. Just to be safe, I'm doing both.